不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中的价值比较 Comparison of clinical value of blood routine test with different blood sampling methods

ISSN:2705-098X(P)

EISSN:2705-0505(O)

语言:中文

作者
赵华玲,Hualing Zhao
文章摘要
目的:探究不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中的临床应用价值。方法:选取本院检验科近一年内(2021.01-2022.01)来院进行血常规检验的对象,进行分组对比的方法进行实验观察与研究。其中一组为A组,进行末梢采血分析并观察记录PLT、RBC、Hb、HCT、MCV、MCH、MCHC、WBC结果;另一组为B组,进行静脉采血分析并观察记录PLT、RBC、Hb、HCT、MCV、MCH、MCHC、WBC、结果。结果:在无其他客观因素干扰时,B组的各项实验观察数据(PLT、RBC、Hb、HCT、MCV、MCH、MCHC、PLT)水平均高于于A组,WBC水平低于A组。结论:通过对两组血常规检验对象的检验报告可知,采用静脉采血的方式对于血常规检验的结果来说更准确,方法有效,值得推广。 Objective: To explore the clinical application value of blood routine test with different blood sampling methods.Methods: In the past one year (2021.01-2022.01), the subjects who came to our hospital for routine blood test were selected for experimental observation and study.The results of PLT, RBC, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC and WBC were observed and recorded in peripheral blood samples of group A, and the results of PLT, RBC, Hb, HCT, MCH, MCHC and WBC were observed and recorded in venous blood samples of group B.Results: The levels of PLT, RBC, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, PLT in group B were higher than those in group A and WBC was lower than that in group A.Conclusion: From the test report of two groups of blood routine test objects, it can be known that the method of venous blood collection is more accurate for the results of blood routine test, and the method is effective, which is worth popularizing.
文章关键词
静脉采血;末梢采血;血常规检验;价值比较 Venous blood collection; peripheral blood collection; routine blood test; value comparison
参考文献
[1] 韩洋.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的价值分析[J].当代医学,2021,27(10):154-155. [2] 吕静.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中的价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(33):140-141.DOI:10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2020.33.067. [3] 姜铭.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中的应用价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(04):89-90.DOI:10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2020.04.069. [4] 沈红.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的价值分析[J].心理月刊,2019,14(19):37-38.DOI:10.19738/j.cnki.psy.2019.19.021. [5] 赵丽.探讨不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的价值[J].中国社区医师,2019,35(27):128+130.
Full Text:
DOI