The Tragedy of "First Impression": Analyzing the Fate of the "Monster" in Frankenstein from the Perspective of the Primacy Effect

ISSN:3029 2360

EISSN:3029-2344

语言:英文

作者
Gang He
文章摘要
This paper employs the primacy effect theory to analyze the generative mechanism of the "monster's" tragic fate in Frankenstein, integrating the cognitive dissonance theory and stigma theory to explore how appearance-based prejudice triggers group exclusion and individual psychological distortion through "cognitive violence." Under the primacy effect, the "monster" elicits negative first impressions from humans due to its grotesque appearance, encountering systematic exclusion such as abandonment by its creator Victor, attacks from villagers, and expulsion by the De Lacey family (Shelley, 2014). Its kind deeds are misinterpreted due to cognitive dissonance and fail to reverse the prejudice (Yan & Li, 2015). Based on stigma theory, the "monster's" appearance is defined as a "discrediting characteristic," which, after being negated by Victor's diary and reinforced by social labeling, ultimately leads to stigma internalization. The "monster" shifts from "yearning for integration" to revenge and finally self-immolates at the end of its vendetta (Goffman, 1963/1986; Guo, 2015). Through the logical chain of "primacy effect triggering prejudice → cognitive dissonance reinforcing exclusion → stigmatization fostering cognitive violence," this paper deepens the understanding of the novel's themes of "social exclusion" and "cognitive violence," providing insights for reflecting on the harms of "labeled cognition" in reality and constructing an inclusive cognitive system.
文章关键词
Frankenstein; Primacy Effect; Cognitive Dissonance; Stigma Theory
参考文献
[1] Goffman,E.(1963/1986).Stigma:Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Touchestone Books;Prentice Hall. [2] Kleinman,A.(1988).The illness narratives:Suffering,healing,and the human condition.Basic Books. [3] Kleinman,A.(2006).What really matters:Living a moral life amidst uncertainty and danger.Oxford University Press. [4] Link,B.G.,&Phelan,J.C.(2001).Conceptualizing stigma.Annual Review of Sociology,27,363–385. [5] Shelley,M.(2017).The new annotated Frankenstein(L.S.Klinger,Ed.).Liveright Publishing Corporation. [6] Shelley,M.(2014).Frankenstein(X.Liu,Trans.).Shanghai Translation Publishing House. [7] Yang,L.H.,Cho,S.H.,&Kleinman,A.(2008).Stigma of mental illness.In K.Heggenhougen&S.Quah(Eds.),International encyclopedia of public health.Academic Press. [8] Guo,Q.G.,&Xiao,A.L.(2022).The sociality of the primacy effect in communication behavior:Based on the Gestalt psychological field theory.Chinese Review of Social Psychology,(1),24–41+223. [9] Guo,J.H.(2015).The study of stigma:The evolution of concepts,theories and models.Journal of Xuehai,(2),99–109. [10] Yan,X.L.,&Li,A.T.(2015).An analysis of the causes and countermeasures of college students'weariness of learning based on cognitive dissonance theory.Jiangsu Higher Education,(6),132–134. [11] Goffman,E.(2009).Stigma:Notes on the management of spoiled identity(S.H.Song,Trans.).The Commercial Press. [12] Shi,R.H.(1988).Dictionary of social psychology.Sichuan People's Publishing House. [13] Wang,C.Y.,&Ye,Z.C.(2023).The primacy effect and cross-cultural community cognition:A comparative experiment of two news forms from the perspective of cultural dimensions.Journal of Journalism and Communication Review,76(2),56–69. [14] Yao,X.L.,Huang,Y.Y.,&Pan,S.M.(2014).A review of foreign stigma theory research.Social Sciences Abroad,(3),119–133. [15] Zou,X.R.,&Chen,J.F.(2013).The lack of primacy effect in scientific paper abstracts and improvement countermeasures.Publishing Research,(8),92–94.
Full Text:
DOI